If we forced the school to accept all athletes, the academic mission would be sure to fail. Protecting candidates from this type of discrimination will only hurt the students.Īdditionally, the school would need to be able to discriminate based on the ability levels and learning styles of the incoming students. If a candidate is unable to demonstrate sufficient background knowledge on sports, they will not be able to make classes engaging for the students. For example, a physics teacher could incorporate exercises that are based on the movement and force of a football or softball over time. Since the students are interested in academics and sports, it may be desirable to relate class lessons to different sports activities. Forcing the school to hire teachers and enroll students that do not have a sports-related background will work against the overall mission. Protecting candidates that would not help achieve the specialized mission of the organization harms the other teachers and students in the school.Imagine a given school that has a mission of academic success for various types of athletes. Protecting candidates that would not help achieve the specialized mission of the organization harms the other teachers and students in the school. When a school has a specialized mission and focus, it needs to be able to hire specialized individuals. Some types of discrimination are actually beneficial to teachers, students, and the rest of society. Allowing families to choose their schools will only work to eliminate unhealthy discrimination such as racism in hiring. Ultimately, this would lead to a competitive advantage for school Y for not being racist! Families would recognize this advantage, choose school Y, and force school X to face a shutdown condition. If an alternative school, Y, does not practice the same discrimination, they will benefit by having a larger pool of teacher candidates. If they are racist against race 2, they will likely choose to hire race 1, regardless of the actual quality of the teacher. They can choose to hire a teacher of race 1 or race 2. Even if we allow all types of discrimination, the evil individuals in charge of the private schools will financially pay for the act.įor example, let’s assume that the people in charge of school X are racist. For simplicity, let’s assume that people running private schools are indeed racist, sexist, evil individuals. We don’t want public funding to go to schools that are run by malevolent people. Discrimination in enrolling students increases the probability that all students are in a successful, specialized learning environment.ĭiscrimination in hiring employees increases the likelihood that children are educated by teachers aligned with their interests and abilities.We can all agree that the intentions behind this policy are well-meaning. Discrimination in hiring employees increases the likelihood that children are educated by teachers that are aligned with their interests and abilities. While discrimination policies aim to protect employees and children, the result is the opposite. School choice programs around the world prohibit discrimination in hiring employees and enrolling students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |